🔗 Share this article

The nation's decisive policy to prohibit social networking access for those under 16 is sending ripples internationally. Politicians, campaigners, and guardians are observing intently to see if this approach will set a precedent for countries abroad.

The European Movement

Across Europe, a growing number of countries are considering similar measures.

• Denmark has stated a ban on social media for youth below 15, with the prime minister stating that smartphones and platforms are "taking away our children's innocence". Legislation could be enacted soon.
• The Norwegian government is planning to introduce a age restriction of 15, citing the need to safeguard young people from the "power of the AI".
• The Irish government is working on a digital wallet to confirm the age and identity of social media account holders. Officials have suggested that an similar ban is "an tools under consideration".
• In Spain, the president has asked the legislature to pass a bill increasing the access age for accessing social media to 16.
• In France, the head of state has proposed a ban for those under fifteen, and a government panel has recommended a similar step, including an overnight "internet blackout" for older teenagers.
• The authorities in the Netherlands has urged families to restrict their kids from social media before 15.

For the broader EU, the bloc's legislature has approved a advisory resolution calling for a ban for under-16s without a parent decides otherwise is provided. Even though it warns of the "habit-forming" nature of these apps, the step does not create mandatory rules.

"A strong age barrier is a solid foundation," commented one MEP driving the measure.

The UK: An Evidence-Based Stance

Across Britain, the government has remained open to a potential ban, arguing that "no measure is discarded" but stressing any policy must be "based on conclusive data".

Last year, interest gathered behind a proposal to enact restrictions on social media use by under-16s, but it was ultimately watered down. Instead, the government vowed to conduct more studies the issue.

Campaign organizations have raised warnings. One foundation founded by the loved ones of a teenager who took her own life after viewing harmful social media material argues that a strict age ban might not improve online safety and could result in a "dangerous transition" of exposure when teens become eligible.

"This ban is a answer to the failure of the Silicon Valley to design products and services that are appropriate and age appropriate for children," commented a leading online safety campaigner.

The US: A State-by-State Approach

In the United States, regulation is primarily occurring at the regional government level amid country-wide stalemate.

• The state of Utah mandates guardian permission for minors to use social media and restricts late-night use.
• Florida has signed a bill barring those below 14 from joining social media, though it is entangled in legal challenges.
• Virginia has passed a rule restricting teenagers to one hour of social media use per day, with extra use dependent on a guardian's okay.
• The state of Georgia, The state of Tennessee, and Louisiana have also introduced measures requiring guardian approval for minors to create social media profiles.

Even with widespread concern and proposals from some politicians to mimic Australia's example, a federal ban is right now seen as a distant prospect.

Worldwide Outlook

Beyond the West, other states are similarly exploring options.

• Malaysia aims to restrict social media for teenagers effective next year.
• The Brazilian authorities has raised the minimum age for the platform Instagram to 16.

However, world bodies strike a more nuanced position. The UN children's agency has cautioned that social media bans carry risks and "might backfire". The organization notes that social networks can be a "vital connection" for vulnerable children and that bans should not be a "excuse" for tech companies to invest in child safeguards.

While this worldwide discussion unfolds, the steps of the Australian government and several other countries show that policymakers internationally are no longer content to wait for the industry to self-regulate.